🚨 When Democracy Held Its Breath: The MISA Ordinance and the Lessons for UPSC Aspirants
— A Modern Blog by Suryavanshi IAS
🔍 What
Happened?
Late one night, during the operation of the
Emergency in India, the President promulgated an ordinance under Article
123 amending the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA).
This amendment empowered Central and State
governments to:
- Detain any person up to one year
- Without assigning reasons
- Solely on the ground that detention was necessary “for effectively
dealing with the Emergency”
This wasn't just a law. It was a mirror
reflecting the clash between state power and citizen freedom.
📘 UPSC
Relevance: Why Should You Care?
📚 Subject |
📌 Relevance |
Polity (GS-II) |
Ordinance-making powers, preventive detention, Article 22 vs Article
123 |
History (GS-I) |
The Emergency (1975–77) as a turning point in India’s democratic
journey |
Ethics (GS-IV) |
Executive overreach vs constitutional morality |
Essay Paper |
Themes like “Freedom under Siege”, “Law vs Justice”, or “Balance
between National Security and Individual Liberty” |
⚖️ The
Constitution Under Pressure
🟡 Ordinance
Power (Art. 123)
Used when Parliament is not in session. But
during the Emergency, this became a tool for bypassing debate and scrutiny.
🔴 Fundamental
Rights Suspended
With Articles 19 and 21 effectively
disabled, people could be detained with no right to legal remedy.
UPSC Insight:
Use this as a case study in answers about the abuse of executive
power or need for checks and balances.
💡 What
Aspirants Must Learn from MISA
1️⃣ Power Must Be Accountable
The MISA ordinance allowed for detention
without trial. This goes against natural justice and due process.
As an administrator, you must stand for fairness—even in crises.
2️⃣ Law Is Not Always Justice
Just because something is “legal” doesn’t mean
it is “right.” Ethics in governance is not about following rules blindly—it’s
about protecting values.
3️⃣ India's Institutions Matter
Emergency-era misuse of laws led to Judicial
failure (ADM Jabalpur Case) and Executive overreach. Today, UPSC
aspirants must know how robust institutions protect democracy.
🧠 Model UPSC
Question (GS Paper II)
Q:
"Preventive detention laws are necessary, but they must not override
constitutional morality." Examine in light of the MISA ordinance during
the Emergency.
📝 Structure for Answer:
- Introduction: Define preventive detention
- Body: Explain MISA amendment, Article 123 misuse
- Impact on fundamental rights (esp. Article 22)
- Lessons from Emergency and role of judiciary
- Conclusion: Need for balance, accountability, and safeguards
📌 Final
Thought by Suryavanshi IAS
“UPSC doesn’t just want you to know the law.
It wants you to understand its spirit.
The MISA ordinance teaches us that when liberty is taken for granted,
governance can turn into control.”
🗂️ Quick
Revision Flashcards
- MISA Full Form:
Maintenance of Internal Security Act
- Year Passed: 1971
- Emergency Period:
1975–77
- Article Used: 123
(ordinance), 22 (detention), 359 (rights suspension)
- Case Reference: ADM
Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)
No comments:
Post a Comment