Supreme Court Judgment: Sukdeb Saha vs The State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

📌 Background

• Case arose after the suicide of a 17-year-old NEET aspirant in a hostel at Visakhapatnam.

• Father alleged police inaction → sought CBI probe.

• SC transferred probe to CBI + went beyond → recognised mental health as part of Article 21 (Right to Life).

---

📌 Key Features of the Judgment

1. Mental Health under Article 21

   • Expands Right to Life → includes psychological well-being.

   • Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 → gave statutory right; now elevated to constitutional protection.

2. “Saha Guidelines” (Interim Orders)

   • Binding until Parliament enacts full law.

   • Schools, colleges, hostels, coaching centres → must set up mental health support systems.

   • States/UTs → to notify rules in 2 months.

   • District-level monitoring committees → to oversee compliance.

3. Structural Victimisation & Violence

   • SC linked student suicides to systemic neglect (coaching culture, lack of safeguards).

   • Inspired by Johan Galtung’s structural violence theory → harm caused by societal structures can be as damaging as direct violence.

   • Reframed suicides as public injustice, not private tragedy.

---

📌 Why it is Landmark?

• Victimology lens → Students seen as “rights holders,” not passive victims.

• Criminological dimension → Institutions and State can be “de facto perpetrators” if they neglect safeguards.

• Restorative justice approach → prevention, counselling, accountability → beyond retribution.

• Elevated normative benchmark → Citizens can demand mental health as fundamental right, not just welfare.

---

📌 Challenges Ahead

• Implementation depends on schools, universities, and States.

• Risk of judgment being symbolic if resources, trained counsellors, and awareness are not invested.

• Cultural stigma around mental health persists.

---

📌 Significance for UPSC

• GS-II → Fundamental Rights, Education, Governance, Judicial activism.

• GS-IV (Ethics) → Empathy, Responsibility of Institutions, Structural Violence.

• Essay → “Right to Life must mean a life of dignity and mental well-being.”

• Case Study (Ethics) → Use “Saha Guidelines” as best practice in mental health governance.

---

✅ One-line conclusion for exam:

The Sukdeb Saha judgment redefines the Right to Life by constitutionalising mental health, recognising institutional neglect as structural violence, and giving students a long-denied voice as rights holders. Its true legacy will depend on whether society and the State turn this recognition into meaningful action.