From Kargil to Pahalgam: India’s Security Doctrine Transformed
A Strategic Reflection on 26 Years of Evolving National Defence
✍️ By Suryavanshi IAS
🧭 Introduction
July 26, 2025, marks the 26th anniversary of the Kargil War — a defining chapter in India’s post-independence military history. But this year, the remembrance comes with a chilling echo of a new turning point — Operation Sindoor (May 2025), India's largest anti-terror strike till date, following a brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir.
This blog draws a strategic continuum between Kargil 1999 and Pahalgam 2025, analysing:
-
Evolution in India’s military doctrine
-
Changes in counter-terror strategy
-
Shifts in defence preparedness
-
Implications for UPSC GS-II (IR & Security) and GS-III (Defence & Technology)
🗻 Kargil: The Wake-Up Call (1999)
🔹 Context:
-
Pakistan's stealth infiltration into Kargil heights in May 1999.
-
India responded with Operation Vijay, reclaiming territory under high-altitude warfare conditions.
🔍 Key Takeaways:
| Domain | Lessons from Kargil |
|---|---|
| Nuclear Deterrence | First limited war under nuclear overhang (post-1998 tests) |
| Intelligence Gaps | Total failure to detect enemy infiltration |
| Logistics & Equipment | Ill-prepared troops for high-altitude warfare |
| Civil-Military Disconnect | Lack of integrated strategic decision-making |
| Global Support | Minimal due to pre-9/11 global narrative on terror |
-
Defence Intelligence Agency (2002)
-
National Technical Research Organisation (2004)
-
Strengthened RAW–IB–Military coordination
-
Cold Start Doctrine for rapid retaliation
-
Creation of CDS (2019) and Integrated Theatre Commands (ongoing)
💥 Operation Sindoor 2025: India's Response to Terror Redefined
🔥 Trigger:
-
April 22, 2025: 26 tourists killed in Pahalgam by Pakistan-based terrorists.
-
May 7–10, 2025: India launches Operation Sindoor, targeting:
-
9 terror bases
-
11 Pakistani military air bases
-
Nuclear facility at Nur Khan base (crippled)
-
🔥 Key Outcomes:
-
Precision strikes using BrahMos, air-power, and long-range artillery
-
Pakistan forced to seek a ceasefire within 96 hours
-
Global community acknowledged India’s restraint + decisiveness
🔄 Kargil vs. Pahalgam: A Strategic Comparison
| Parameter | Kargil 1999 | Pahalgam 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of Threat | Territorial intrusion | Terror attack on civilians |
| Response | Mountain warfare; reclaiming ground | Cross-border strike, deep penetration |
| Geopolitical Mood | Limited global support | Post-9/11 global sympathy against terror |
| Outcome | Eviction of infiltrators | Destruction of terror + military targets |
| Strategic Message | India will fight to defend its land | India will punish terror anywhere, decisively |
🇮🇳 India's Doctrinal Evolution: From Reactive to Proactive
⚔️ Post-Kargil Focus:
-
Conventional force strengthening
-
Border management reforms
-
Mountain warfare readiness
🛡️ Post-Pulwama & Pahalgam Shift:
-
Pre-emptive strike policy
-
Surgical precision in counter-terror ops
-
Credible escalation without crossing nuclear threshold
🧠 Strategic Lessons for UPSC Aspirants
| Theme | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Security Doctrine | GS-III: Internal Security, Border Management |
| Defence Reforms | GS-III: Modernisation of Armed Forces |
| Intelligence Coordination | GS-II: Governance, Role of Agencies |
| Neighbourhood Security | GS-II: India–Pakistan Relations |
| Tech in Warfare | Use of BrahMos, indigenous platforms (Make in India) |
| Essay | India’s strategic culture, national security, and deterrence |
📚 Mains Practice Questions
Q1. Kargil was a watershed moment in India's military reforms, while Pahalgam marked a doctrinal shift in counter-terrorism. Discuss.
Q2. In the context of recent developments, analyse India’s approach to securing its national interests through offensive defence.
🧭 Conclusion: A New Strategic Era
From the freezing cliffs of Kargil to the ruthless response after Pahalgam, India’s security doctrine has undergone a radical transformation:
-
From reactive defence to proactive punishment
-
From external dependence to indigenous strength (Make in India)
-
From diplomatic restraint to strategic deterrence
The message is clear: India will no longer absorb terror silently. The 2025 strikes signal a new red line in India’s fight against cross-border terrorism.
But vigilance is eternal. The Kargil Review taught us the cost of complacency. Operation Sindoor reminds us that the cost of silence can be higher.
✍️ By Suryavanshi IAS – UPSC Smart Prep Series
📘 Special Focus: Internal Security, Defence Modernisation, and India’s Strategic Doctrine
No comments:
Post a Comment