A Holistic Approach to Conserving India’s Monuments: Beyond Brick and Mortar
(A blog for UPSC aspirants by Suryavanshi IAS)
Introduction
In his Independence Day speeches from the Red Fort, Prime
Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly urged citizens to remember India’s
freedom fighters. While the sentiment is laudable, his approach—listing names
and quoting select leaders—is as outdated as the Archaeological Survey of
India’s (ASI) conventional methods of heritage conservation. The ASI’s current
strategy—identifying monuments, isolating them, and occasionally restoring
them—falls short in preserving the rich, interconnected history they represent.
Given India’s vast and complex past, there is an urgent
need for a more thoughtful, inclusive, and interdisciplinary approach to
monument conservation—one that goes beyond structural repairs and engages with
the living heritage around these sites.
The Colonial Legacy in Conservation
The ASI’s conservation framework is rooted in colonial-era
practices. British officials like John Marshall catalogued ancient structures
(temples, stupas, forts, etc.) not just for historical interest but also as
tools for governance. Marshall’s Conservation Manual (1923) advocated
for extensive repairs and converting monument surroundings into manicured
gardens—a practice still followed today.
However, this approach has limitations:
- Monuments
are treated in isolation, disconnected from their
cultural and ecological contexts.
- Many
ASI-protected sites are crumbling due to neglect, as
highlighted by audits and court rulings.
- Corporate
adoption of monuments, while providing funds, risks
commercializing heritage without deeper engagement.
Clearly, India needs a new conservation roadmap—one
that integrates modern insights while respecting the past.
Lessons from Gandhi and Ruskin: A
People-Centric Approach
Mahatma Gandhi’s Sarvodaya (inspired by
John Ruskin’s writings) offers key lessons:
- Monuments
should serve the living, not just preserve the
dead past.
- Conservation
must improve lives of nearby communities and
visitors.
- Interpretive
materials should highlight the builders’
skills, resilience, and socio-cultural context.
This philosophy suggests that ASI’s new manual should:
✅ Focus on community
involvement in conservation.
✅ Use monuments as educational
tools to appreciate India’s diverse craftsmanship.
✅ Ensure tourism
benefits locals economically and culturally.
Interdisciplinary Insights for Modern
Conservation
1. Translation Studies: Context Matters
Modern translators don’t just reproduce texts—they engage
with historical context and evolving meanings. Similarly, ASI should:
- Acknowledge
the gap between past and present when restoring
monuments.
- Clearly
mark modern interventions (like new bricks in
old forts) to avoid misleading interpretations.
- Regularly
review conservation materials to ensure they
don’t harm ancient structures.
2. Wildlife Biology: Ecosystems Over Isolated
Entities
Wildlife biologists conserve entire ecosystems,
not just individual species. Similarly, ASI should:
- Study
linkages between monuments and their
surroundings (water bodies, forests, settlements).
- Remove
unnecessary boundary walls that disconnect
monuments from their natural settings.
3. Mycology: Small Monuments Matter
Fungi play a crucial role in breaking down and renewing
organic matter. Likewise, small, neglected monuments (old city
walls, stepwells, cenotaphs) can:
- Recharge
groundwater (like ancient baolis).
- Boost
local economies through tourism.
- Serve
as public spaces fostering community bonding.
4. Economics: Value Beyond Aesthetics
Economists argue that value lies in function, not
just appearance. ASI should:
- Restore
functional systems (like natural ventilation in
havelis) rather than superficial repainting.
- Highlight
scarcity (e.g., endangered heritage crafts)
to justify higher conservation budgets.
- Use
"creative destruction"—repurposing submerged
temples as underwater archaeology labs.
Citizen’s Role: Making Conservation a
Collective Effort
In a diverse nation like India, heritage conservation must
be participatory:
- Educate
yourself on monument histories.
- Learn
to "read" stone inscriptions and architectural styles to
understand deeper narratives.
- Challenge
biases—monuments reflect both glory and
oppression (e.g., colonial-era buildings).
- Advocate
for policies that integrate heritage with urban
planning.
Conclusion: India as a "Monument Without
Walls"
India’s heritage is not just about isolated structures—it’s
a living, evolving tapestry of cultures, ecosystems, and
memories. The ASI must adopt a holistic, interdisciplinary, and
people-centric conservation model.
For UPSC aspirants, this issue is crucial for:
- GS
Paper I (Indian Heritage & Culture)
- GS
Paper III (Conservation & Environment)
- Essay
& Ethics (Community Participation in Governance)
By reimagining conservation, we can ensure that India’s
monuments remain not just relics of the past, but beacons for the
future.
(Suryavanshi IAS is a renowned mentor for UPSC aspirants. Follow for more insights on governance, history, and
policy.)
No comments:
Post a Comment