Q: “Discuss the constitutional and governance challenges highlighted by the recent Tamil Nadu–Centre dispute on RTE reimbursements. Suggest a way forward.”
Answer:
Introduction
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act) mandates free elementary education for children aged 6–14 years. Section 12(1)(c) provides 25% reservation in private unaided schools for disadvantaged groups, with the state reimbursing schools for the costs. Recently, Tamil Nadu raised a dispute with the Union Government regarding pending reimbursements, bringing forth constitutional and governance challenges.
Constitutional Challenges
-
Division of Powers (Seventh Schedule):
-
Education is in the Concurrent List. Disputes over financial liability expose ambiguities in Centre–State responsibilities.
-
-
Article 21A – Fundamental Right:
-
The right to free education becomes ineffective if funding mechanisms are unclear or delayed.
-
-
Article 14 – Equality:
-
Differential reimbursement practices across states may violate the principle of equal treatment.
-
-
Federalism Concerns (Article 246, Article 280):
-
States argue that the Centre should bear greater responsibility since it enacted the legislation without adequately compensating states (similar to GST compensation debates).
-
Governance Challenges
-
Delayed Reimbursements:
-
Schools face financial stress, leading to reluctance in admitting RTE quota students.
-
-
Lack of Transparency in Calculation:
-
Disputes on how the reimbursement is computed (per-child cost vs. actual school fee).
-
-
Administrative Burden:
-
Schools must navigate complex paperwork; verification delays hurt timely disbursal.
-
-
Centre–State Trust Deficit:
-
Political differences (e.g., between Tamil Nadu and the Union Government) exacerbate the problem, reducing cooperative federalism.
-
Way Forward
-
Clear Fiscal Responsibility:
-
Define a formula under the Finance Commission’s recommendations, ensuring predictable Centre–State sharing of RTE costs.
-
-
Dedicated RTE Fund:
-
Establish a time-bound centralised fund (similar to GST compensation cess) to prevent payment delays.
-
-
Digital Monitoring System:
-
A unified online portal for applications, verification, and reimbursement to improve efficiency.
-
-
Periodic Review:
-
Independent audits and parliamentary/state legislature reviews of RTE fund flow.
-
-
Strengthening Cooperative Federalism:
-
Institutionalise regular Centre–State dialogues via Inter-State Council or education-specific federal forums.
-
Conclusion
The Tamil Nadu–Centre dispute reflects larger tensions in India’s federal structure, especially regarding unfunded mandates from the Union. Ensuring clarity in fiscal sharing, timely reimbursements, and cooperative governance is essential to uphold the spirit of Article 21A and make the RTE Act effective.
No comments:
Post a Comment