Simultaneous Elections: Constitutional Debate
India is once again discussing a major electoral reform — simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies (popularly called One Nation, One Election). Recently, former Chief Justice of India Justice B.R. Gavai shared his views before Parliament’s Joint Committee reviewing the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024.
๐ What is the Issue?
Currently, elections in India happen frequently:
-
Lok Sabha every 5 years
-
State Assemblies at different times
-
Panchayat/Municipal polls separately
The proposed amendment aims to synchronise elections.
⚖️ Justice B.R. Gavai’s Key Observations
Justice Gavai argued that:
-
Structure of elections → Same
-
Voter rights → Same
-
Democratic framework → Intact
๐ Therefore, constitutionally valid.
-
State governments continue functioning independently
-
No-confidence motions remain available
๐ Accountability mechanisms survive.
๐ค Why is There Disagreement?
Among six former Chief Justices consulted:
❗ Concerns Raised By:
-
Justice U.U. Lalit
-
Justice Sanjiv Khanna
✔ Supportive Views From:
-
Justice Ranjan Gogoi
-
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
Justice J.S. Khehar
-
Justice B.R. Gavai
๐ Their position: No Basic Structure violation
๐ง UPSC Concept Connection
๐ Basic Structure Doctrine
Originated in:
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
๐ Federalism
-
Division of powers between Union & States
-
Regular elections ensure democratic legitimacy
๐️ Parliamentary Joint Committee’s Role
Headed by:
P. P. Chaudhary
๐ณ️ New Suggestion: Common Electoral Roll
Committee members proposed:
✅ Single voter list for:
-
Panchayat elections
-
Municipal elections
-
Assembly elections
-
Lok Sabha elections
Why?
๐ฏ Why This Topic is Important for UPSC 2026
This issue touches multiple GS areas:
| Paper | Relevance |
|---|---|
| GS II | Constitution, Parliament, Elections |
| GS IV | Ethics in governance (cost vs democracy) |
| Essay | Electoral reforms / Federalism |
| Prelims | Basic Structure / Amendments |
๐ Balanced UPSC Takeaway
An ideal UPSC answer should mention:
✔ Arguments in favour
-
Cost reduction
-
Governance stability
-
Reduced MCC disruptions
✔ Arguments against
-
Federal autonomy concerns
-
Mid-term government collapse complications
-
Logistical challenges
✔ Judicial debate
-
Divergent views of former CJIs
✔ Neutral conclusion
-
Reform requires safeguards
No comments:
Post a Comment