Citizen Engagement in Health Governance: A Critical Analysis for UPSC Aspirants
By Suryavanshi IAS
Introduction
The recent state initiatives like Tamil Nadu’s Makkalai
Thedi Maruthuvam (2021) and Karnataka’s Gruha Arogya (2024,
expanded in 2025) highlight India’s shift towards doorstep healthcare delivery
for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). While these schemes improve
accessibility, they also raise an important governance question: How
effectively can citizens participate in health policy-making?
This blog explores citizen engagement in health
governance, linking it to UPSC’s General Studies (GS) Paper 2
(Governance) and GS Paper 3 (Health). We will also analyze previous UPSC
questions (last 10 years) related to this topic.
Why Citizen Engagement in Health Governance
Matters?
1. Democratic Accountability & Inclusivity
- Ensures
policies reflect people’s needs, not just bureaucratic or medical elite
decisions.
- Example: Village
Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) under NRHM
(2005) aimed at decentralised health planning but faced challenges like
infrequent meetings and underutilised funds.
2. Combats Epistemic Injustice
- Marginalised
communities (Dalits, tribals, women) often lack representation in health
policy.
- Example: Mahila
Arogya Samitis in urban areas remain ineffective due to social
hierarchies.
3. Improves Health Outcomes
- Engaged
communities collaborate better with frontline workers (ASHA, ANMs).
- Example: Kerala’s People’s
Planning Campaign (1996) improved local health governance.
Challenges in India’s Health Governance
Issue |
Impact |
Medical Dominance |
Doctors (with biomedical training) lead health
administration, ignoring social determinants of health. |
Tokenistic Participation |
Committees like VHSNCs exist on paper but lack real
power. |
Beneficiary Mindset |
Citizens are seen as passive recipients, not rights-holders. |
Lack of Structural Reforms |
No incentives for administrators to involve communities. |
UPSC Previous Year Questions (PYQs) – Prelims
& Mains
Prelims Questions (Last 10 Years)
1. Which of the following is/are the key
components of the National Health Mission (NHM)? (2018)
1.
ASHA workers
2.
Rogi Kalyan Samitis
3.
Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK)
4.
Pradhan Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojana
(PMSSY)
Answer: 1, 2, 3
- Explanation: PMSSY
is a separate scheme for tertiary care, while NHM focuses on primary and
secondary healthcare through ASHAs, VHSNCs, and Rogi Kalyan Samitis.
2. Consider the following statements about
VHSNCs: (2016)
1.
They are mandated under the National Health
Mission.
2.
They include PRI representatives.
3.
They monitor ICDS and sanitation.
Answer: 1, 2, 3
- Explanation: VHSNCs
are part of NHM, involve Panchayati Raj members, and oversee health,
nutrition, and sanitation.
Mains Questions (GS-2 & GS-3)
1. "Public participation in health
governance remains weak in India." Discuss the reasons and suggest
reforms. (GS-2, 2020)
- Key
Points:
- Reasons: Medical
dominance, bureaucratic resistance, lack of awareness.
- Reforms: Strengthening
VHSNCs, training health administrators in participatory governance,
social audits.
2. Critically examine the role of ASHA workers
in India’s health system. (GS-2, 2019)
- Key
Points:
- Successes: Bridge
between communities and health systems.
- Challenges: Overburdened,
low wages, lack of formal recognition.
3. How can India improve its healthcare
delivery system for non-communicable diseases (NCDs)? (GS-3, 2021)
- Key
Points:
- Doorstep
schemes like Tamil Nadu’s Makkalai
Thedi Maruthuvam.
- Preventive
care through community engagement.
Way Forward: Reforming Health Governance
1.
Shift from ‘Beneficiary’ to
‘Rights-Holder’ Approach – Use terms like "health
rights-holders" instead of "beneficiaries."
2.
Strengthen Local Committees –
Regular meetings, social audits, and untied funds for VHSNCs.
3.
Training for Administrators –
Public health leadership courses for IAS/health officers.
4.
Inclusive Participation –
Reserved seats for marginalised groups in health committees.
Conclusion
India’s health governance needs structural reforms to
move beyond tokenistic participation. Schemes like Makkalai Thedi
Maruthuvam are commendable, but without empowered citizen
engagement, they risk becoming top-down interventions.
For UPSC aspirants, this topic is crucial for GS-2
(Governance) and GS-3 (Health). Previous questions show UPSC’s focus
on decentralisation, ASHA workers, and NCD management—making this a
high-yield area for 2025-26.
For more UPSC insights, follow Suryavanshi IAS!
No comments:
Post a Comment