Blog Archive

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Electoral Integrity, ECI's Power, and Democratic Safeguards

 Electoral Integrity, ECI's Power, and Democratic Safeguards

Recent events involving the Election Commission of India (ECI) have ignited a crucial debate on electoral integrity, the limits of constitutional authority, and the health of Indian democracy. For a UPSC aspirant, this is not just current affairs; it's a live case study intersecting Polity, Governance, and Ethics. This blog will deconstruct the issue, link it to the UPSC syllabus, analyze the constitutional provisions involved, and review important Previous Year Questions (PYQs).


The Core of the Controversy: Two Press Conferences

The saga began with two pivotal press conferences that set the stage for a constitutional and political showdown.

  1. Press Conference by the Leader of Opposition (LoP), Rahul Gandhi (August 7, 2025):

    • The Allegation: The LoP presented evidence of alleged mass manipulation of the electoral roll in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment (Bangalore) during the 2024 General Elections.

    • Specific Charges: His disclosures included:

      • Multiple voters (in some cases, up to 80) registered under a single address.

      • Bogus entries with father's name listed as 'xyz' and house number as '0'.

    • Significance: If true, such irregularities strike at the very root of free and fair elections, undermining the principle of universal adult suffrage and the credibility of India's democracy.

  2. Press Conference by the Election Commission of India (ECI) (August 17, 2025):

    • The Response: Instead of addressing the specific allegations technically, the ECI issued an ultimatum to the LoP: either provide evidence via a sworn affidavit or apologize to the nation.

    • Public Perception: This response was widely perceived as adversarial and unusual for a neutral constitutional body. It raised questions about the ECI's role: is it an impartial arbiter or a participant in political slugfests?


Connecting to the UPSC Syllabus

This issue is a goldmine for answers in GS Papers II, III, and IV.

  • GS Paper II:

    • Indian Constitution—Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features: Role and powers of constitutional bodies like the ECI.

    • Statutory, Regulatory and various Quasi-judicial Bodies: ECI's composition, functions, and independence.

    • Salient Features of the Representation of People’s Act.

    • Separation of Powers between various organs; Dispute Redressal Mechanisms.

  • GS Paper II: Governance

    • Important Aspects of Governance: Transparency and accountability.

    • Role of Civil Services in a Democracy. (ECI is supported by a cadre of officers)

  • GS Paper IV: Ethics

    • Ethics and Human Interface: Integrity, impartiality, and non-partisanship.

    • Challenges of Corruption: Electoral malpractice is a form of political corruption.

    • Probity in Governance: Accountability of constitutional authorities.


Constitutional and Legal Provisions at a Glance

  1. Article 324: Superintendence, direction and control of elections.

    • Vests vast powers in the ECI to conduct free and fair elections.

    • The Supreme Court has called it a "reservoir of powers".

    • The Catch: These powers are not "unfettered" or "arbitrary". They must be exercised within the framework of the Constitution and laws made by Parliament.

  2. The Representation of the People Act, 1950:

    • Deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls.

    • Section 14(b): Mandates January 1st as the single 'qualifying date' for determining a person's age and residency for voter registration.

    • Section 21: Provides for revision of electoral rolls. It can be:

      • Summary Revision: A routine process for adding/deleting names.

      • Intensive Revision: Involves a house-to-house verification for preparing a roll afresh.

      • Special Revision: Can be done at any time for specific constituencies, but the qualifying date remains January 1.

  3. Registration of Electors Rules, 1960:

    • Rule 25: Details the process of intensive revision, which requires registration officers to visit every dwelling house to verify details.


The Bihar SIR Controversy: A Technical Misstep?

The ECI's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, where Assembly elections are due, is a critical part of this story.

  • The Problem: The term "Special Intensive Revision" is not found in the RPA, 1950 or the 1960 Rules.

  • Violation of Qualifying Date: The SIR uses July 1 as the qualifying date, directly violating Section 14(b) of the RPA, 1950, which explicitly sets January 1 as the qualifying date.

  • Impractical Timeline: An "intensive revision" requiring house-to-house verification across an entire state like Bihar is logistically impossible to complete fairly within a month. This has led to chaos and the deletion of ~65 lakh voters, sparking a political agitation.

  • Supreme Court's Intervention: In an interim order, the SC directed the ECI to publish the names and reasons for deletion, upholding transparency. This order was a check on the ECI's exercise of power.


Previous Year Questions (PYQs) within the Last 8 Years

This theme has been consistently asked. Here are some relevant questions:

  1. 2023: "The Supreme Court of India keeps a check on arbitrary power of the Parliament in amending the Constitution." Discuss critically. (Relates to checks on power of constitutional bodies)

  2. 2022: "Discuss the essential conditions for the exercise of the legislative powers by the Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature." (Tests understanding of limits of constitutional authority)

  3. 2021: "To what extent, in your view, the Parliament is able to ensure accountability of the executive in India?" (Relates to accountability of institutions like ECI)

  4. 2020: "Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of a large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities." (Directly on Judiciary checking Executive/Constitutional bodies)

  5. 2019: "‘In the context of neo-liberal paradigm of development planning, multi-level planning is expected to make operations cost effective and remove many implementation blockages.’ Discuss." (Indirectly on governance and implementation)

  6. 2018: "Whether the Supreme Court Judgement (July 2018) can settle the political tussle between the Lt. Governor and elected government of Delhi?" (Case study on constitutional bodies in political disputes)

  7. 2017: "The role of the Governor is especially critical in the hung assemblies. Examine." (Relates to the conduct of neutral constitutional authorities)


Key Terms and Concepts for Mains Answer Writing

  • Article 324 of the Indian Constitution

  • Representation of the People Act, 1950 & 1951

  • Qualifying Date (January 1)

  • Summary vs. Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls

  • Free and Fair Elections (Basic Structure Doctrine)

  • Judicial Review

  • Constitutional Morality vs. Constitutional Propriety

  • Neutrality and Independence of Constitutional Bodies

  • S.R. Bommai Case (on Judicial Review)

  • A.C. Jose vs Sivan Pillai Case (1984) - on limits of ECI's power)


Way Forward and Conclusion

The current situation presents a critical juncture for Indian democracy.

  • The ECI's Primary Duty: Its fundamental constitutional obligation is to ensure the integrity of the electoral roll. When serious allegations are raised, its duty is to investigate them transparently and correct systemic faults, not to engage in political ultimatums.

  • Need for Transparency: The Supreme Court's order in the Bihar case, mandating the publication of names and reasons for deletion, sets a healthy precedent for accountability.

  • Balancing Power and Responsibility: As Justice Fazal Ali presciently warned in the A.C. Jose case (1984), unlimited and arbitrary power in the hands of the ECI could lead to a "political havoc" or a "constitutional crisis." The ECI must wield its vast powers under Article 324 with utmost judiciousness and neutrality.

For UPSC aspirants, this episode is a stark reminder that the theoretical provisions of the Constitution are constantly tested in the real world. Understanding the delicate balance of power, the importance of institutional integrity, and the role of judicial oversight is crucial not just for the exam, but for being informed citizens of the world's largest democracy.

Stay Informed, Stay Ahead!

- Team Suryavanshi IAS

No comments:

Post a Comment

Microbes, Plastics, and Antibiotic Resistance: Insights from the Sundarbans

  Microbes, Plastics, and Antibiotic Resistance: Insights from the Sundarbans Context A study by the Indian Institute of Science Education...